From m.mariani@imola.nettuno.it Fri Jan 18 19:16:32 2002 Received: from zoidberg (adsl-169-11.38-151.net24.it [151.38.11.169]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g0IIGVs19156 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:16:32 +0100 Received: from volvox by zoidberg with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16RdZW-00036O-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:17:02 +0100 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:17:02 +0100 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Message-ID: <20020118181702.GA11811@zoidberg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i From: Marco Mariani Subject: [egenix-users] beebase Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Are there any examples using mx-beebase? I can hardly use it, what does "record address must be an integer" means? Looking at the docs, I should be able to say d = BeeDict('test') d['something'] = 'hulabaloo' d.commit() but it ain't so. Thanks From mal@lemburg.com Fri Jan 18 20:15:35 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g0IJFZs19517; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 20:15:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3C487534.8975759F@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 20:19:16 +0100 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco Mariani CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] beebase References: <20020118181702.GA11811@zoidberg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Marco Mariani wrote: > > Are there any examples using mx-beebase? No, but the sources are well documented. > I can hardly use it, what does "record address must be an integer" means? That hints to a problem with mxBeeBase when compiling Python with large file support: file.tell() will return a long rather than an integer and the mxBeeBase wrapper doesn't like this. > Looking at the docs, I should be able to say > > d = BeeDict('test') > > d['something'] = 'hulabaloo' > d.commit() > > but it ain't so. > > Thanks BTW, how did you find this list ? I haven't even announced it yet ;-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Tue Jan 29 19:58:16 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g0TIwFs23245; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:58:15 +0100 Message-ID: <3C56F1B8.AEEC5048@lemburg.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:02:16 +0100 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] Mail problems Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Welcome to the list ! Someone just mentioned to me that the MX record in DNS for lists.egenix.com was missing. I have fixed that now, but due to the delay in DNS it may take a while until the change propogates. This means that you are likely not going to be able to send mail to this list today. Sorry about that, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Fri Feb 1 12:11:36 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g11BBZs17711; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:11:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3C5A78E5.4AF297C6@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:15:49 +0100 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] Upcoming 2.1.0 release of eGenix.com mx BASE Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi everybody, there will be a new release of the mx BASE distribution this month and I was wondering whether you'd like to test drive the current alpha of that version. Here's a short overview of what has changed: * mxTextTools does now fully support Unicode (this is a sponsored feature addition) * mxBeeBase is starting to feel at home on non-Unix platforms as well, esp. Windows where it didn't work before in locking mode. mxBeeBase offers you many possibilities, BTW, e.g. on-disk dictionaries and fast lookups. + The usual bunch of small tweaks and changes. Before the final version I also plan to add mxURL from the experimental distribution to mx base. Here's the current pre-release as distutils source package: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0.zip Please give it a go and let me know what you think. I'll update the above file every now and then (in place), but will post updates to this list. Thanks, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From maxm@mxm.dk Thu Feb 7 14:56:24 2002 Received: from fe030.worldonline.dk (fe030.worldonline.dk [212.54.64.197]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g17DuOs09182 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:56:24 +0100 Received: (qmail 31846 invoked by uid 0); 7 Feb 2002 13:56:24 -0000 Received: from 213.237.27.77.adsl.od.worldonline.dk (HELO mxm.dk) (213.237.27.77) by fe030.worldonline.dk with SMTP; 7 Feb 2002 13:56:24 -0000 Message-ID: <3C628795.2080602@mxm.dk> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 13:56:37 +0000 From: Max M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020119 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] problem with mx.ODBC MS SQL-server and datetime Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I am trying out mx.ODBC on MS sql server, and so far it goes along nicely. But I am having trouble with inserting dates ie. from mx.DateTime The error message is: ('01004', 0, '[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Fractional truncation', 4479) The only thing i could find on the net was (one line only): http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=da&frame=right&th=841f8af29973b8ba&seekm=mailman.989913322.21800.python-list%40python.org#link2 Where somebody has the same problem: "Marc-Andre answer: Looks like MS SQL Server's ODBC driver is being too careful again. What you are seeing there is a SQL warning which mxODBC translates into an exception." the advice is "recompiling the package with -DDONT_REPORT_WARNINGS" I would find it a lot easier to just catch the exception. But I cannot see from the traceback which exception to catch. So I have made a quick hack: try: # it bitches about dates c.execute(qs, localValues) except: pass That's about as dirty as it gets. So I wondered what the better way to do it is? As far as i can tell it just raises a general exception. Not one that I can catch explicitly. Do I really have to re-compile? And if so what is needed? regards Max M From mal@lemburg.com Thu Feb 7 17:34:25 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g17GYOs10183; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:34:25 +0100 Message-ID: <3C62ACA4.37A66B03@lemburg.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 17:34:44 +0100 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max M CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] problem with mx.ODBC MS SQL-server and datetime References: <3C628795.2080602@mxm.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Max M wrote: > > I am trying out mx.ODBC on MS sql server, and so far it goes along nicely. > > But I am having trouble with inserting dates ie. from mx.DateTime > The error message is: > ('01004', 0, '[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Fractional truncation', > 4479) > > The only thing i could find on the net was (one line only): > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=da&frame=right&th=841f8af29973b8ba&seekm=mailman.989913322.21800.python-list%40python.org#link2 > > Where somebody has the same problem: > > "Marc-Andre answer: > Looks like MS SQL Server's ODBC driver is being too careful again. > What you are seeing there is a SQL warning which mxODBC translates > into an exception." > > the advice is "recompiling the package with -DDONT_REPORT_WARNINGS" > > I would find it a lot easier to just catch the exception. But I cannot > see from the traceback which exception to catch. You'll have to catch the mx.ODBC.Windows.Warning exception and then look at the first item of the reason tuple to tell which warning was issued. Then to fix the problem, I'd suggest to convert the DateTime object to a datetime string value with only two digit fractions. str(datetime) does this for you. > So I have made a quick > hack: > > try: # it bitches about dates > c.execute(qs, localValues) > except: > pass > > That's about as dirty as it gets. So I wondered what the better way to > do it is? As far as i can tell it just raises a general exception. Not > one that I can catch explicitly. > > Do I really have to re-compile? And if so what is needed? You'll need MS VC++ installed, the Python installation and the mxODBC sources. Then python setup.py build build_ext -DDONT_REPORT_WARNINGS install will do the trick and install the new versions on top of what you probably already have installed. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From maxm@mxm.dk Thu Feb 21 18:14:36 2002 Received: from fe040.worldonline.dk (fe040.worldonline.dk [212.54.64.205]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g1LHEas15328 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:14:36 +0100 Received: (qmail 30739 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2002 17:14:35 -0000 Received: from 213.237.27.77.adsl.od.worldonline.dk (HELO mxm.dk) (213.237.27.77) by fe040.worldonline.dk with SMTP; 21 Feb 2002 17:14:35 -0000 Message-ID: <3C752B18.3070709@mxm.dk> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:15:04 +0000 From: Max M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020119 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] comparing DateTime types Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi This works as I expect: type(mx.DateTime.now()) == type(mx.DateTime.DateTime(2002)) >>> 1 But this doesn't: type(mx.DateTime.now()) == type(mx.DateTime.DateTimeType) >>> 0 Do I have to compare instances? I would have thought that comparing with the "DateTimeType" directly would suffice. regards Max M From Jim.Vickroy@noaa.gov Thu Feb 21 18:26:05 2002 Received: from cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov (cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov [140.172.224.30]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g1LHQ4s15449 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:26:04 +0100 Received: from noaa.gov ([140.172.224.138]) by cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GRW8FF00.344; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:26:03 -0700 Message-ID: <3C752DAB.3605C79A@noaa.gov> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:26:03 -0700 From: "Jim Vickroy" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max M CC: egenix-users Subject: Re: [egenix-users] comparing DateTime types References: <3C752B18.3070709@mxm.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello Max, I'm using Python 2.2 and here is the behavior: >>> import mx.DateTime >>> type(mx.DateTime.now()) >>> type(mx.DateTime.DateTimeType) >>> mx.DateTime.DateTimeType >>> type(mx.DateTime.now()) == mx.DateTime.DateTimeType 1 >>> Note that the type of DateTimeType is 'type' which is as expected -- the type of a type is 'type'. Max M wrote: > Hi > > This works as I expect: > type(mx.DateTime.now()) == type(mx.DateTime.DateTime(2002)) > >>> 1 > > But this doesn't: > type(mx.DateTime.now()) == type(mx.DateTime.DateTimeType) > >>> 0 > > Do I have to compare instances? I would have thought that comparing with > the "DateTimeType" directly would suffice. > > regards Max M > > _______________________________________________________________________ > eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/ > http://lists.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users From maxm@mxm.dk Thu Feb 21 18:29:17 2002 Received: from fe170.worldonline.dk (fe170.worldonline.dk [212.54.64.199]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g1LHTHs15475 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 18:29:17 +0100 Received: (qmail 31476 invoked by uid 0); 21 Feb 2002 17:29:13 -0000 Received: from 213.237.27.77.adsl.od.worldonline.dk (HELO mxm.dk) (213.237.27.77) by fe170.worldonline.dk with SMTP; 21 Feb 2002 17:29:13 -0000 Message-ID: <3C752E89.4030709@mxm.dk> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:29:45 +0000 From: Max M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.7+) Gecko/20020119 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Vickroy CC: egenix-users Subject: Re: [egenix-users] comparing DateTime types References: <3C752B18.3070709@mxm.dk> <3C752DAB.3605C79A@noaa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Jim Vickroy wrote: >Note that the type of DateTimeType is 'type' which is as expected -- the >type of a type is 'type'. > Doh! I guess gotta read up on "Gödel, Escher, Bach" one more time. Especially the sections about meta levels! regards Max m From jh@web.de Thu Feb 21 19:36:29 2002 Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp02.web.de [217.72.192.151]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g1LIaTs15986 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:36:29 +0100 Received: from [80.131.145.48] (helo=owlglass) by smtp.web.de with smtp (WEB.DE(Exim) 4.28 #21) id 16dy4d-00042x-00; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:36:07 +0100 From: "Juergen Hermann" To: "Jim Vickroy" , "Max M" Cc: "egenix-users" Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:36:20 +0100 Reply-To: "Juergen Hermann" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Standard (2.10.2010) For Windows NT (4.0.1381;6) In-Reply-To: <3C752E89.4030709@mxm.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Re: [egenix-users] comparing DateTime types Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by www.egenix.com id g1LIaTs15986 Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:29:45 +0000, Max M wrote: >I guess gotta read up on "Gödel, Escher, Bach" one more time. Especially >the sections about meta levels! That apart, type checks should be done with isinstance()! Ciao, Jürgen From sholden@holdenweb.com Thu Feb 21 22:17:41 2002 Received: from mail2.registeredsite.com (mail2.registeredsite.com [64.224.9.11]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g1LLHes17092 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:17:40 +0100 Received: from mail.holdenweb.com (mail.holdenweb.com [64.224.159.178]) by mail2.registeredsite.com (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g1LKNCV23620; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:23:12 -0500 Received: from thinker [64.224.159.178] by mail.holdenweb.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id A3F03BCA0072; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:17:36 -0500 Message-ID: <00f801c1bb1d$21c09740$d200000a@holdenweb.com> From: "Steve Holden" To: "Max M" , "egenix-users" References: <3C752B18.3070709@mxm.dk> Subject: Re: [egenix-users] comparing DateTime types Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:17:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max M" To: "egenix-users" Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: [egenix-users] comparing DateTime types > Hi > > This works as I expect: > type(mx.DateTime.now()) == type(mx.DateTime.DateTime(2002)) > >>> 1 > > But this doesn't: > type(mx.DateTime.now()) == type(mx.DateTime.DateTimeType) > >>> 0 > > Do I have to compare instances? I would have thought that comparing with > the "DateTimeType" directly would suffice. > >>> import mx.DateTime as dt >>> dt.DateTimeType >>> type(dt.now()) The magic you were looking for is probably type(mx.DateTime.now()) == mx.DateTime.DateTimeType The problem here is that type(mx.DateTime.DateTimeType) is a type, whose type should therefore be typeType. >>> type(dt.DateTimeType) Hope this helps. regards Steve -- Consulting, training, speaking: http://www.holdenweb.com/ Author, Python Web Programming: http://pydish.holdenweb.com/pwp/ "This is Python. We don't care much about theory, except where it intersects with useful practice." Aahz Maruch on c.l.py From egrubbs@rackspace.com Sat Mar 30 03:24:56 2002 Received: from anubis.cymitar.com (64-39-1-26.dhcp.hq.rackspace.com [64.39.1.26]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g2U2Ots30072 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 03:24:55 +0100 Received: by anubis.cymitar.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 562402F77; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:24:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anubis.cymitar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F522F76 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:24:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 20:24:23 -0600 (CST) From: Edwin Grubbs X-X-Sender: egrubbs@zamboni.wc6.rackspace.com To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I am having a problem with DateTime incorrectly rounding the floating point second value down 1/100 of second. Python 2.2 (#1, Mar 13 2002, 12:34:11) [GCC 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from mx.DateTime import * >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.00) >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.01) >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.02) >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.03) >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.04) >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.05) >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.06) -Edwin Grubbs From mal@lemburg.com Tue Apr 2 19:31:36 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g32HVas31561; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:31:36 +0200 Message-ID: <3CA9EAF8.A528E748@lemburg.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 19:31:36 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Grubbs CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Edwin Grubbs wrote: > > I am having a problem with DateTime incorrectly rounding the floating > point second value down 1/100 of second. > > Python 2.2 (#1, Mar 13 2002, 12:34:11) > [GCC 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)] on linux2 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> from mx.DateTime import * > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.00) > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.01) > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.02) > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.03) > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.04) > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.05) > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.06) > That's because 5.05 is really 5.0499999999999998. mxDateTime's repr() function truncates the seconds value to avoid accidental cases of a 60 reading when you really only have 59.6 seconds. Use now().second to access the true seconds value with full accuracy. HTH, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From egrubbs@rackspace.com Tue Apr 2 22:27:02 2002 Received: from anubis.cymitar.com (64-39-1-26.dhcp.hq.rackspace.com [64.39.1.26]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g32KR2s32718 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 22:27:02 +0200 Received: by anubis.cymitar.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 744CA2F7B; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:26:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anubis.cymitar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715642F7A for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:26:16 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 14:26:16 -0600 (CST) From: Edwin Grubbs X-X-Sender: egrubbs@zamboni.wc6.rackspace.com To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds In-Reply-To: <3CA9EAF8.A528E748@lemburg.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Edwin Grubbs wrote: > > > > I am having a problem with DateTime incorrectly rounding the floating > > point second value down 1/100 of second. > > > > Python 2.2 (#1, Mar 13 2002, 12:34:11) > > [GCC 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)] on linux2 > > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > > >>> from mx.DateTime import * > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.00) > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.01) > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.02) > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.03) > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.04) > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.05) > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.06) > > > > That's because 5.05 is really 5.0499999999999998. mxDateTime's > repr() function truncates the seconds value to avoid accidental > cases of a 60 reading when you really only have 59.6 seconds. > > Use now().second to access the true seconds value with > full accuracy. > > HTH, > The real problem with it, is that str() returns the truncated date just like repr(), and we are using str() to insert datetime fields. If you create a DateTime object for 03:04:05.02 and insert it into a Postgres 7 database using its str() value, it is stored as 03:04:05.01. Then when you retrieve 03:04:05.01 from the database, the DateTime object shows it as 03:04:05.00. Then you cannot match the row that you just retrieved with its datetime column. How is the DateTime object supposed to be inserted and retrieved from the database? I understand that a float cannot represent most decimal values exactly, but truncating just increases the inaccuracy even though it might seem more coherent to have "2002-03-28 10:59:59.9999" truncated to "2002-03-28 10:59:59.99" instead of rounded to "2002-03-28 11:00:00.00". -Edwin From sholden@holdenweb.com Wed Apr 3 14:28:27 2002 Received: from mail3.registeredsite.com (mail3.registeredsite.com [64.224.9.12]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g33CSQs07371 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:28:27 +0200 Received: from mail.holdenweb.com (mail.holdenweb.com [64.224.159.178]) by mail3.registeredsite.com (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g33BXgx27819; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 06:33:43 -0500 Received: from COMPUTER [64.224.159.178] by mail.holdenweb.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id A568188100FC; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 07:28:24 -0500 Message-ID: <025701c1db0a$a94dab00$d200000a@COMPUTER> From: "Steve Holden" To: "Edwin Grubbs" , References: Subject: Re: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 07:25:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edwin Grubbs" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > > Edwin Grubbs wrote: > > > > > > I am having a problem with DateTime incorrectly rounding the floating > > > point second value down 1/100 of second. > > > > > > Python 2.2 (#1, Mar 13 2002, 12:34:11) > > > [GCC 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)] on linux2 > > > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > > > >>> from mx.DateTime import * > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.00) > > > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.01) > > > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.02) > > > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.03) > > > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.04) > > > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.05) > > > > > > >>> DateTime(2002, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.06) > > > > > > > That's because 5.05 is really 5.0499999999999998. mxDateTime's > > repr() function truncates the seconds value to avoid accidental > > cases of a 60 reading when you really only have 59.6 seconds. > > > > Use now().second to access the true seconds value with > > full accuracy. > > > > HTH, > > > > The real problem with it, is that str() returns the truncated date just > like repr(), and we are using str() to insert datetime fields. If you > create a DateTime object for 03:04:05.02 and insert it into a Postgres 7 > database using its str() value, it is stored as 03:04:05.01. Then when you > retrieve 03:04:05.01 from the database, the DateTime object shows it as > 03:04:05.00. Then you cannot match the row that you just retrieved with > its datetime column. How is the DateTime object supposed to be inserted > and retrieved from the database? > Isn't the *real* real problem (;-) i that you are using character fields to store date values? Normally one is supposed to use a timestamp or datetime field to store these values (if you store them as strings then equality is the only sensible test you can make. As datetime values you can also use <, >, BETWEEN, etc.). However, even this solution sometimes has pitfalls - stroing datetimes in either Access of SQL Server (I think the latter, but it's a long time ago) raies warnings abour field truncation, which you have to cure by removing any fractional seconds before storage. > I understand that a float cannot represent most decimal values exactly, > but truncating just increases the inaccuracy even though it might seem > more coherent to have "2002-03-28 10:59:59.9999" truncated to "2002-03-28 > 10:59:59.99" instead of rounded to "2002-03-28 11:00:00.00". > Just as one asks for trouble by treating floats as exact, it's problematic to store date/time values as strings. If you DBMS has no date/time type, consider converting the dates to an appropriate numeric format. regards Steve From mal@lemburg.com Wed Apr 3 15:18:41 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g33DIfs07788; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:18:41 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 15:19:47 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Grubbs CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Edwin Grubbs wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > > Edwin Grubbs wrote: > > > > > > I am having a problem with DateTime incorrectly rounding the floating > > > point second value down 1/100 of second. > > That's because 5.05 is really 5.0499999999999998. mxDateTime's > > repr() function truncates the seconds value to avoid accidental > > cases of a 60 reading when you really only have 59.6 seconds. > > > > Use now().second to access the true seconds value with > > full accuracy. > > The real problem with it, is that str() returns the truncated date just > like repr(), and we are using str() to insert datetime fields. If you > create a DateTime object for 03:04:05.02 and insert it into a Postgres 7 > database using its str() value, it is stored as 03:04:05.01. Then when you > retrieve 03:04:05.01 from the database, the DateTime object shows it as > 03:04:05.00. Then you cannot match the row that you just retrieved with > its datetime column. How is the DateTime object supposed to be inserted > and retrieved from the database? The database interface should use the C API for this. It preserves the accuracy all the way. If that's not an option, I'd consider using the tuple representation now().tuple() which mimics time.localtime(time.time()) (but with added seconds accuracy). > I understand that a float cannot represent most decimal values exactly, > but truncating just increases the inaccuracy even though it might seem > more coherent to have "2002-03-28 10:59:59.9999" truncated to "2002-03-28 > 10:59:59.99" instead of rounded to "2002-03-28 11:00:00.00". Hmm, one possibility would be to use rounding for all second values < 59.995 and apply truncation to all others. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From holtwick@spirito.de Thu Apr 4 09:07:48 2002 Received: from main.spirito.de (main.spirito.de [213.9.98.5]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g3477ms16205 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:07:48 +0200 Received: (qmail 19038 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 07:13:21 -0000 Received: from acb04099.ipt.aol.com (HELO spirito.de) (holtwick@172.176.64.153) by main.spirito.de with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 07:13:21 -0000 Message-ID: <3CABFBC3.5040405@spirito.de> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 09:07:47 +0200 From: Dirk Holtwick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com References: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] New releases? Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Marc-Andre, when do you plan to release the new versions of mxExperimental and mxBase? Maybe testing of the newer versions could become easier with a "beta testing" are on your website? I didn't find any bigger problems in the new version. Cheers, Dirk From mal@lemburg.com Thu Apr 4 12:52:47 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g34Aqls17692; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:52:47 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAC30C7.3C581021@lemburg.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 12:53:59 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Holtwick CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] New releases? References: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> <3CABFBC3.5040405@spirito.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Dirk Holtwick wrote: > > Hi Marc-Andre, > > when do you plan to release the new versions of mxExperimental and > mxBase? Maybe testing of the newer versions could become easier with a > "beta testing" are on your website? I didn't find any bigger problems in > the new version. I was too busy the last few weeks to work on this, but since you ask, I'll upload the latest betas today and let you know. FWIW, I'm especially interested in hearing about the changes to mxBeeBase -- it should work on Windows and Unix now and it supports large files (up to 4GB) on Unix machines which have this. If all works out, mxBeeBase would make a great alternative to the various DBM packages out there since it is self-contained and aims to be platform independent (both API and data file wise). -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Thu Apr 4 16:37:04 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g34Eb4s19153; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:37:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAC6558.6CF10ABB@lemburg.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 16:38:16 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Holtwick CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] New releases? References: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> <3CABFBC3.5040405@spirito.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Ok, I won't find time for the betas today. To not let you wait, here's something else: I updated mxCGIPython to now play nice with importing shared modules. This means that you can start using your favourite DateTime package with cgipython in CGI scripts ! Here's the new mxCGIPython version: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/mxCGIPython.html I've tested it with Python 2.1, but 2.2 should also work. Have fun, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Thu Apr 4 19:44:04 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g34Hi4s20641; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 19:44:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAC9127.60C3B1C8@lemburg.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 19:45:11 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Grubbs , egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] DateTime error rounding seconds References: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > > The real problem with it, is that str() returns the truncated date just > > like repr(), and we are using str() to insert datetime fields. If you > > create a DateTime object for 03:04:05.02 and insert it into a Postgres 7 > > database using its str() value, it is stored as 03:04:05.01. Then when you > > retrieve 03:04:05.01 from the database, the DateTime object shows it as > > 03:04:05.00. Then you cannot match the row that you just retrieved with > > its datetime column. How is the DateTime object supposed to be inserted > > and retrieved from the database? > > The database interface should use the C API for this. It preserves > the accuracy all the way. If that's not an option, I'd consider using > the tuple representation now().tuple() which mimics > time.localtime(time.time()) (but with added seconds accuracy). > > > I understand that a float cannot represent most decimal values exactly, > > but truncating just increases the inaccuracy even though it might seem > > more coherent to have "2002-03-28 10:59:59.9999" truncated to "2002-03-28 > > 10:59:59.99" instead of rounded to "2002-03-28 11:00:00.00". > > Hmm, one possibility would be to use rounding for all second > values < 59.995 and apply truncation to all others. Ok, I've change this now to have str(DateTime(...)) round seconds to two decimal places with the exception of second values >=59.995 and <60.00. The latter are all mapped to 59.99. This may sound like a strange method, but in practice should enhance accuracy when interfacing with other storage mechanisms using string representations. If anyone needs the old behaviour, I'll add a compile time #define to switch back to the old behaviour. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From pramasub@bigmachines.com Fri Apr 5 05:11:36 2002 Received: from smtps.bigmachines.com (ppp-63-201-248-231.bigmachines.com [63.201.248.231] (may be forged)) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g353BZs25335 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 05:11:35 +0200 Received: FROM bmfmail.bigmachines BY smtps.bigmachines.com ; Thu Apr 04 19:11:45 2002 -0800 Received: from bmfc159 ([10.1.1.1]) by bmfmail.bigmachines (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-65145U1000L100S0V35) with SMTP id bigmachines for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 19:11:24 -0800 Message-ID: <000a01c1dc50$226b8250$320210ac@bigmachines.com> From: pramasub@bigmachines.com (Prathibha Ram) To: Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 19:15:27 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1DC0D.14268980" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Subject: [egenix-users] question Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1DC0D.14268980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all Since I have started using the new exgenix mx Base package, I keep = getting compilation errors in import. I was using the previous version = of the mx package and my import statement in files used to be import = mx.DateTime. What should this be changed to since this is no longer = recognized and I keep getting the compile error. Also now I get the following error Traceback (innermost last): File "", line 8, in ? File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line 40, in ? File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line 48, in = modinit File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/copy_reg.py", line 16, in pickle TypeError: copy_reg is not intended for use with classes can anyone suggest anything about the above error?=20 Thanks very much for your input and time.=20 Prathibbha I use jython in conjunction with java on an NT machine. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1DC0D.14268980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all
 
Since I have started using the new = exgenix mx Base=20 package, I keep getting compilation errors in import. I was using the = previous=20 version of the mx package and my import statement in files used to be = import=20 mx.DateTime. What should this be changed to since this is no longer = recognized and I keep getting the compile error.
 
Also now I get the following = error
Traceback (innermost last):
  File "<string>", line = 8, in=20 ?
  File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line = 40, in=20 ?
  File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line = 48, in=20 modinit
  File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/copy_reg.py", line 16, in=20 pickle
TypeError: copy_reg is not intended for use with classes
 
can anyone suggest anything about the = above error?=20

Thanks very much for your input and time.
Prathibbha
 
I use jython in conjunction with java on an NT=20 machine.
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C1DC0D.14268980-- From mal@lemburg.com Fri Apr 5 10:07:18 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g3587Is27115; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 10:07:18 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAD5B82.B6267E0C@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 10:08:34 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prathibha Ram CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] question References: <000a01c1dc50$226b8250$320210ac@bigmachines.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > Prathibha Ram wrote: > > Hi all > > Since I have started using the new exgenix mx Base package, I keep > getting compilation errors in import. I was using the previous version > of the mx package and my import statement in files used to be import > mx.DateTime. What should this be changed to since this is no longer > recognized and I keep getting the compile error. > > Also now I get the following error > Traceback (innermost last): > File "", line 8, in ? > File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line 40, in ? > File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line 48, in > modinit > File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/copy_reg.py", line 16, in pickle > TypeError: copy_reg is not intended for use with classes > > can anyone suggest anything about the above error? The eGenix mx Tools only support CPython, not Jython. You probably can still use them with Jython if you hook JPE up to the Java VM, though, or interface to them via JNI directly. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ PS: Please don't post HTML messages to the list. Thanks. From mal@lemburg.com Fri Apr 5 22:20:15 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g35KKFs32080; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:20:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAE0749.77E43CE7@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 22:21:29 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Prathibha Ram CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] question References: <000a01c1dc50$226b8250$320210ac@bigmachines.com> <3CAD5B82.B6267E0C@lemburg.com> <001101c1dcd9$345f0160$320210ac@bigmachines.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Prathibha Ram wrote: > > Hi Mark: > I was already using the mx extension version(prior to 2.0.3) with jython1.5 > and it was fine. All I did was import the mx.DateTime package in my code. > Even now, the old version of the mx Extension package works fine with jython > 2.1 except that it gives the copy_reg error first time I invoke jython. You could probably use the Python code in the mxDateTime package, but you wouldn't have access to the two types defined in the C extension. Now, someone wrote a Python emulation for those two which now lives in mxDateTime/mxDateTime_Python.py but that file is not being actively maintained. > Do > you think if I go in for commercial support you would be able to configure > your mx Extension for jython2.1? Probably not all of them since some use third party C libs which are hard to rewrite in Python or Java. For mxDateTime, Brian Zimmer is working on an Java version. With funding, I could also bring the Python emulation of the mxDateTime extension back up-to-date and reenable it (see mxDateTime/__init__.py if you want to give it try with the old emulation). > The reason I am asking is that otherwise, I > will have to shelve all the extension packages that I have been using till > now. I might have to start using the time module in jython and write some py > files of my own for date manipulations. We'll figure out a way to let you continue your usage of mxDateTime in Jython :-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Fri Apr 5 22:21:47 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g35KLls32110; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 22:21:47 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAE07A5.2322636E@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 22:23:01 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Subject: Re: [egenix-users] question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Mark: I was already using the mx extension version(prior to 2.0.3) with jython1.5 and it was fine. All I did was import the mx.DateTime package in my code. Even now, the old version of the mx Extension package works fine with jython 2.1 except that it gives the copy_reg error first time I invoke jython. Do you think if I go in for commercial support you would be able to configure your mx Extension for jython2.1? The reason I am asking is that otherwise, I will have to shelve all the extension packages that I have been using till now. I might have to start using the time module in jython and write some py files of my own for date manipulations. I will appreciate your reply. Thank you for your input and time. Prathibbha. ----- Original Message ----- From: "M.-A. Lemburg" To: "Prathibha Ram" Cc: Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 12:08 AM Subject: Re: [egenix-users] question > > Prathibha Ram wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > Since I have started using the new exgenix mx Base package, I keep > > getting compilation errors in import. I was using the previous version > > of the mx package and my import statement in files used to be import > > mx.DateTime. What should this be changed to since this is no longer > > recognized and I keep getting the compile error. > > > > Also now I get the following error > > Traceback (innermost last): > > File "", line 8, in ? > > File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line 40, in ? > > File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/mx/DateTime/__init__.py", line 48, in > > modinit > > File "/mach/jython-2.1/Lib/copy_reg.py", line 16, in pickle > > TypeError: copy_reg is not intended for use with classes > > > > can anyone suggest anything about the above error? > > The eGenix mx Tools only support CPython, not Jython. You > probably can still use them with Jython if you hook JPE up > to the Java VM, though, or interface to them via JNI > directly. > > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH > ______________________________________________________________________ > Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ > Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ > > PS: Please don't post HTML messages to the list. Thanks. > From mal@lemburg.com Fri Apr 5 23:51:46 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g35Lpks00336; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:51:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAE1CBC.B597D946@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 23:53:00 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] ANN: eGenix.com mx BASE 2.1.0 (beta1) + EXPERIMENTAL 0.7.0 (beta1) Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Ok, I've finally found the time to wrap up the first betas for the two packages. Here they are (sorry, no time to sort these links): http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.2_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py1.5.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.1_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.0.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.1.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.2_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.1_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.tar.gz http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.zip http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.0_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py1.5_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py1.5_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.0_1.i386.rpm and http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.0.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.1.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py1.5_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.1_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.0_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.1_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.0_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.zip http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.2_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.tar.gz http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py1.5_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.2_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py1.5.exe Please have a look at the various documentation files for a list of changes. Most important are probably the enhanced mxBeeBase (BASE), the updated mxUID (EXP), better compile support for mxNumber (EXP) and the usual bunch of small bug fixes. Have fun, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From Jim.Vickroy@noaa.gov Sat Apr 6 00:05:43 2002 Received: from cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov (cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov [140.172.224.30]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g35M5hs00888 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:05:43 +0200 Received: from noaa.gov ([140.172.224.138]) by cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GU481H00.LF0; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:05:41 -0700 Message-ID: <3CAE1FB6.35B3EE2C@noaa.gov> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:05:43 -0700 From: "Jim Vickroy" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M.-A. Lemburg" CC: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Subject: Re: [egenix-users] ANN: eGenix.com mx BASE 2.1.0 (beta1) + EXPERIMENTAL 0.7.0 (beta1) References: <3CAE1CBC.B597D946@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Marc, I'm having an access difficulty. When I click on a Windows link, here is the message: The requested URL /files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe was not found on this server. "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > Ok, I've finally found the time to wrap up the first betas > for the two packages. Here they are (sorry, no time to sort > these links): > > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.2_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py1.5.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.1_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.0.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.1.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.2_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.1_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.tar.gz > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.zip > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.0_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py1.5_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py1.5_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.0_1.i386.rpm > > and > > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.0.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.1.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py1.5_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.1_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.0_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.1_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.0_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.zip > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.2_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.tar.gz > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py1.5_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.2_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py1.5.exe > > Please have a look at the various documentation files for > a list of changes. Most important are probably the enhanced > mxBeeBase (BASE), the updated mxUID (EXP), better compile > support for mxNumber (EXP) and the usual bunch of small > bug fixes. > > Have fun, > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH > ______________________________________________________________________ > Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ > Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ > > _______________________________________________________________________ > eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/ > http://lists.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users From Jim.Vickroy@noaa.gov Sat Apr 6 00:12:16 2002 Received: from cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov (cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov [140.172.224.30]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g35MCFs00980 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:12:15 +0200 Received: from noaa.gov ([140.172.224.138]) by cripplecreek.sec.noaa.gov (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GU48CE00.TDX; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:12:14 -0700 Message-ID: <3CAE2140.799E1412@noaa.gov> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:12:16 -0700 From: "Jim Vickroy" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M.-A. Lemburg" CC: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Subject: Re: [egenix-users] ANN: eGenix.com mx BASE 2.1.0 (beta1) + EXPERIMENTAL 0.7.0 (beta1) References: <3CAE1CBC.B597D946@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: OK, I waited for a few minutes and now I can access the links. Sorry about that, I guess I just tried too soon the first time. "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > Ok, I've finally found the time to wrap up the first betas > for the two packages. Here they are (sorry, no time to sort > these links): > > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.2_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py1.5.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.1_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.0.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.1.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.2_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.1_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.tar.gz > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1.zip > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.0_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py1.5_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py1.5_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b1-py2.0_1.i386.rpm > > and > > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.0.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.1.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py2.2.exe > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py1.5_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.1_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.0_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.1_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.0_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.zip > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.2_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.tar.gz > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py1.5_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1-py2.2_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-experimental-0.7.0b1.win32-py1.5.exe > > Please have a look at the various documentation files for > a list of changes. Most important are probably the enhanced > mxBeeBase (BASE), the updated mxUID (EXP), better compile > support for mxNumber (EXP) and the usual bunch of small > bug fixes. > > Have fun, > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH > ______________________________________________________________________ > Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ > Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ > > _______________________________________________________________________ > eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/ > http://lists.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users From mal@lemburg.com Sat Apr 6 00:43:35 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g35MhYs01499; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:43:34 +0200 Message-ID: <3CAE28E0.3AE4F5A4@lemburg.com> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 00:44:48 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Vickroy CC: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Subject: Re: [egenix-users] ANN: eGenix.com mx BASE 2.1.0 (beta1) + EXPERIMENTAL 0.7.0 (beta1) References: <3CAE1CBC.B597D946@lemburg.com> <3CAE2140.799E1412@noaa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Jim Vickroy wrote: > > OK, I waited for a few minutes and now I can access the links. Sorry about that, I > guess I just tried too soon the first time. The upload took a little longer than expected ;-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From John.N.1@bwc.state.oh.us Mon Apr 15 18:19:51 2002 Received: from jupiter.bwc.state.oh.us (neptune.BWC.state.OH.US [198.234.212.100]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g3FGJps31586 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:19:51 +0200 Received: by jupiter.bwc.state.oh.us; id MAA17272; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:19:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Received: from unknown(165.223.131.35) by neptune.bwc.state.oh.us via smap (V5.0) id xmaa17254; Mon, 15 Apr 02 12:19:07 -0400 Received: from mswg6.bwc.state.oh.us (MSWG6.bwc.state.oh.us [165.223.130.24]) by venus.bwc.state.oh.us (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02953 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:19:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by MSWG6 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:19:27 -0400 Message-ID: <6FDE0867413DD21182BF00A0C97251920EA8CEBD@MSWG4> To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:19:20 -0400 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Subject: [egenix-users] BeeDict setting keys/comparison to shelve Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Does anyone have comments on using Bdict instead of a standard shelf or bsddb ver3? Also, on Win2k, for me to change a dictionary element w/Bdict, I need to first delete the key and then set it's value. Should that be the case? When I run: d = mx.BeeBase.BeeDict.BeeDict('c:/tmp/test-BeeDict2') print 'original',d['Marc9'] d['Marc9']='betty1' d.commit() print 'dict change\t',d.changed(),d['Marc9'] del(d['Marc9']) d.commit() d['Marc9']='betty2' print 'del dict change\t',d.changed(),d['Marc9'] d.close() produces: original Sveta dict change 0 Sveta del dict change 1 betty2 Thanks for any help, john From bzimmer@ziclix.com Tue Apr 16 06:12:20 2002 Received: from eris.host4u.net (eris.host4u.net [216.71.64.44]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g3G4CJs04594 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 06:12:20 +0200 Received: from mountain (24-148-34-1.na.21stcentury.net [24.148.34.1]) by eris.host4u.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3G4B9502954; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:11:09 -0500 From: "brian zimmer" To: Cc: Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:10:43 -0500 Message-ID: <001f01c1e498$1b5064e0$7401a8c0@mountain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Importance: Normal Subject: [egenix-users] [ANN] zxDateTime 0.1 Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I am happy to announce the initial release of zxDateTime, a drop-in replacement for mxDateTime written in Java, has been made available today. The next planned version will include optimizations as well 100% API implementation (a couple methods are missing). I am particularly interested in getting feedback on the usefulness of this module as well as the porting of other CPython extensions written in C. The initial release can be found at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/zxpy/ The API for mxDateTime can be found at: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/mxDateTime.html Installation directions are included in the distribution. zxDateTime has been tested with Jython 2.1(+), mxDateTime 2.0.3 and JDK1.3.1. Other versions might work but I have not tested them as thoroughly/at all. thanks, brian ps: I'd like to thank Marc-Andre Lemburg for his assistance in porting his work. pss: I'd like to thank the primary Jython developers for making the extending of Jython with Java so much fun :) From mal@lemburg.com Tue Apr 16 12:29:49 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g3GATns06884; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <3CBBFD80.F129BB4E@lemburg.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:31:28 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brian zimmer CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] [ANN] zxDateTime 0.1 References: <001f01c1e498$1b5064e0$7401a8c0@mountain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: brian zimmer wrote: > > I am happy to announce the initial release of zxDateTime, a drop-in > replacement for mxDateTime written in Java, has been made available > today. Way cool ! > ps: I'd like to thank Marc-Andre Lemburg for his assistance in porting > his work. I'd like to thank you for taking the time to write this port and for making it available to the general public. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From maxm@mxm.dk Mon Apr 29 10:55:56 2002 Received: from fe080.worldonline.dk (fe080.worldonline.dk [212.54.64.210]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g3T8tqs01604 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:55:56 +0200 Received: (qmail 6594 invoked by uid 0); 29 Apr 2002 08:55:51 -0000 Received: from 213.237.27.77.adsl.od.worldonline.dk (HELO mxm.dk) (213.237.27.77) by fe080.worldonline.dk with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 08:55:51 -0000 Message-ID: <3CCD0AC5.1030904@mxm.dk> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:56:37 +0200 From: Max M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] Error building egenix-mx-experimental-0.6.0 Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I am trying to build egenix-mx-experimental-0.6.0, on a Linux machine, on which I have only a normal user account. I have copied the .tgz source file to a directory and typed: /home/zope/Zope-2.5.1-linux2-x86/bin/python setup.py build And then it stops at: building 'mx.Number.mxNumber.mxNumber' extension gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC -Imx/Number/mxNumber -I/home/zope/Zope-2.5.1-linux2-x86/include/python2.1 -c mx/Number/mxNumber/mxNumber.c -o build/temp.linux-i586-2.1/mx/Number/mxNumber/mxNumber/mxNumber.o In file included from mx/Number/mxNumber/mxNumber.c:24: mx/Number/mxNumber/mxNumber.h:33: gmp.h: No such file or directory error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 Am I doing it wrong or am I missing a file? I am not too acustomed to Linux so please bear with me. The man page says that it's running gcc-2.95 regards Max M From mal@lemburg.com Mon Apr 29 11:22:02 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g3T9Lrs01817; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:21:54 +0200 Message-ID: <3CCD1130.D10681DA@lemburg.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:24:00 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max M CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] Error building egenix-mx-experimental-0.6.0 References: <3CCD0AC5.1030904@mxm.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Max M wrote: > > I am trying to build egenix-mx-experimental-0.6.0, on a Linux machine, > on which I have only a normal user account. I have copied the .tgz > source file to a directory and typed: > > /home/zope/Zope-2.5.1-linux2-x86/bin/python setup.py build Please try the lastest beta I posted here a couple of weeks ago (see the list archive for the URLs). The mxNumber build is broken in 0.6.0, but should be fixed in 0.7.0b1. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Fri May 17 13:18:10 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g4HBI9t01158; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:18:09 +0200 Message-ID: <3CE4E700.4090802@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:18:24 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] ANN: eGenix.com mx BASE 2.1.0 (beta2) Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi everybody, here's a second round of beta releases for the 2.1.0 release of egenix-mx-base: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py1.5_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py1.5_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.0_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.0_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.1_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.1_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.2_1.i386.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.2_1.src.rpm http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.tar.gz http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.zip Beta 2 includes a few more updates amd bug fixes which were found in the beta 1 cycle. I think I forgot to mention last time that this release features a brand new version of mxTextTools. It now comes with complete Unicode support, a tag table compiler, support for string labels (no more counting of tuple entries ;-) and a few other goodies which will make future development much easier (most noteably the addition of a context object). Please try these out and report any bugs you find to this list. PS: A new version of mxODBC is also in the making, but not quite ready for prime-time yet. If you'd like to alpha test it, please let me know and I'll send you a copy of mxODBC 2.1.0 for testing purposes. Thank you, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From mal@lemburg.com Fri May 17 20:05:42 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g4HI5ft05289; Fri, 17 May 2002 20:05:42 +0200 Message-ID: <3CE54688.8060801@lemburg.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 20:06:00 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M.-A. Lemburg" CC: "eGenix.com User Mailinglist" Subject: Re: [egenix-users] ANN: eGenix.com mx BASE 2.1.0 (beta2) References: <3CE4E700.4090802@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Hi everybody, > > here's a second round of beta releases for the 2.1.0 release > of egenix-mx-base: > > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py1.5_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py1.5_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.0_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.0_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.1_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.1_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.2_1.i386.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2-py2.2_1.src.rpm > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.tar.gz > http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.zip Here are the Windows installers: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.win32-py1.5.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.win32-py2.0.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.win32-py2.1.exe http://www.egenix.com/files/python/egenix-mx-base-2.1.0b2.win32-py2.2.exe > Beta 2 includes a few more updates amd bug fixes which were > found in the beta 1 cycle. > > I think I forgot to mention last time that this release features > a brand new version of mxTextTools. It now comes with complete > Unicode support, a tag table compiler, support for string labels > (no more counting of tuple entries ;-) and a few other goodies > which will make future development much easier (most noteably > the addition of a context object). > > Please try these out and report any bugs you find to this list. > > PS: A new version of mxODBC is also in the making, but not quite > ready for prime-time yet. If you'd like to alpha test it, please > let me know and I'll send you a copy of mxODBC 2.1.0 for testing > purposes. Thank you, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From holtwick@spirito.de Fri May 24 11:25:09 2002 Received: from main.spirito.de (main.spirito.de [213.9.98.5]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id g4O9P9t19403 for ; Fri, 24 May 2002 11:25:09 +0200 Received: (qmail 28560 invoked from network); 24 May 2002 09:31:17 -0000 Received: from pd9e20798.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO spirito.de) (holtwick@217.226.7.152) by main.spirito.de with SMTP; 24 May 2002 09:31:17 -0000 Message-ID: <3CEE0756.3000206@spirito.de> Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 11:26:46 +0200 From: Dirk Holtwick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com References: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> <3CABFBC3.5040405@spirito.de> <3CAC30C7.3C581021@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [egenix-users] week of year Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I noticed some strange behaviour with values for "week of year" with mx.DateTime. I use something like this in my program: Date(year, month, w).strftime("%W") e.g.: Date(2002,5,1).strftime("%W") gives 17 as result. In my german calendar it should be 18, so I add 1. But Date(2001,5,1).strftime("%W") gives 18 and in my calendar its also 18 so adding +1 dosn't work here. what can I do? I use Date(2001,5,1).iso_week[1] and Date(2002,5,1).iso_week[1] that works. But shouldn't it also work with the method described above? bye, dirk --- spirito GmbH Dirk Holtwick Lerchenstraße 8 D-47057 Duisburg Tel. 0203 3187777 holtwick@spirito.de http://www.spirito.de From mal@lemburg.com Mon May 27 11:28:23 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g4R9SNt13993; Mon, 27 May 2002 11:28:23 +0200 Message-ID: <3CF1FC52.1020603@lemburg.com> Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 11:28:50 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Holtwick CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] week of year References: <3CAB0173.589E3584@lemburg.com> <3CABFBC3.5040405@spirito.de> <3CAC30C7.3C581021@lemburg.com> <3CEE0756.3000206@spirito.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Dirk Holtwick wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed some strange behaviour with values for "week of year" with > mx.DateTime. I use something like this in my program: > > Date(year, month, w).strftime("%W") > > e.g.: Date(2002,5,1).strftime("%W") gives 17 as result. In my german > calendar it should be 18, so I add 1. But > Date(2001,5,1).strftime("%W") gives 18 and in my calendar its also 18 so > adding +1 dosn't work here. what can I do? I use Date(2001,5,1).iso_week[1] > and Date(2002,5,1).iso_week[1] that works. But shouldn't it also work > with the method described above? The .strftime() method interfaces directly to the C lib's strftime() API, so if that implementation uses a non-ISO week number calculation, then you see different results. GLIBC: """ %W The week number of the current year as a decimal number, range 00 to 53, starting with the first Monday as the first day of week 01. """ This is clearly not ISO (which is much more complicated) ! -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ From krissepu@vip.fi Sun Jun 9 16:28:13 2002 Received: from populo.vip.fi (populo.vip.fi [213.173.130.25]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g59ESDU18781 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 16:28:13 +0200 Received: from vip.fi (DynIP-132-175.Tre.vip.fi [213.173.132.175]) by populo.vip.fi (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA06551 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 17:28:12 +0300 Message-ID: <3D036557.7E7360F1@vip.fi> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 17:25:27 +0300 From: Pekka Niiranen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] How to create nested search pattern witn mxTextTools ? Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I am searching nested strings that are limited (and include) with ?- and ! -signs. I have created a nested EBNF-search pattern with Simpleparse-1.0 module for mxTextTools. The problem is: I am interested only on matched strings and cannot use flag (true or not ?) "AppendMatch" with SimpleParse. What is the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF -notation below: declaration := a,(match,a)* match := '?',a,(match,a)*,'!' := [-_a-z0-9A-Z:. ]* #Not returning this line in case of a string "aa?BB?CC!DD!ee?FF!gg" it should return: [?BB?CC!DD!, ?CC!, ?FF!] Any help appreciated, -pekka- From mal@lemburg.com Sun Jun 9 16:56:46 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g59EujU18945; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 16:56:45 +0200 Message-ID: <3D036CDA.6000202@lemburg.com> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 16:57:30 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka Niiranen CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] How to create nested search pattern witn mxTextTools ? References: <3D036557.7E7360F1@vip.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Pekka Niiranen wrote: > I am searching nested strings that are limited (and include) > with ?- and ! -signs. > > I have created a nested EBNF-search pattern with Simpleparse-1.0 module > for mxTextTools. The problem is: I am interested only on matched strings > > and cannot use flag (true or not ?) "AppendMatch" with SimpleParse. > > What is the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF -notation below: > > declaration := a,(match,a)* > match := '?',a,(match,a)*,'!' > := [-_a-z0-9A-Z:. ]* #Not returning this line > > in case of a string "aa?BB?CC!DD!ee?FF!gg" > it should return: > > [?BB?CC!DD!, ?CC!, ?FF!] > > Any help appreciated, You should have a look at the SubTable command. It would allow you to do this. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ Meet us at EuroPython 2002: http://www.europython.org/ From mal@lemburg.com Sun Jun 9 18:02:10 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g59G2AU19331; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 18:02:10 +0200 Message-ID: <3D037C2F.1030804@lemburg.com> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 18:02:55 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] mxODBC and FreeTDS to access MS SQL Server Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I'm currently working on getting FreeTDS to work with mxODBC. Unfortunately, I don't have a MS SQL Server instance to test it against. If anyone is willing to try the following setup, please let me know and I'll send you the code: * WinXX server running MS SQL Server * Linux client having FreeTDS installed (version 0.53) Thanks, -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ Meet us at EuroPython 2002: http://www.europython.org/ From mcfletch@rogers.com Sun Jun 9 21:21:53 2002 Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g59JLrU20698 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:21:53 +0200 Received: from rogers.com ([24.43.65.252]) by fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with ESMTP id <20020609192148.LAVP8996.fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@rogers.com>; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 15:21:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3D03AACF.5060700@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 15:21:51 -0400 From: "Mike C. Fletcher" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka Niiranen CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] How to create nested search pattern witn mxTextTools ? References: <3D036557.7E7360F1@vip.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.43.65.252] using ID at Sun, 9 Jun 2002 15:21:48 -0400 Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Pekka, are you sure you're not optimising this app too early? I mean, you're only dealing with 2MB files. The simple loop over the results table isn't likely to be a time problem compared to your original solution with line-by-line regex runs. If you code the whole grammar as an EBNF so you can process the whole file in a single call to TextTools.tag, you're not likely going to be able to detect the time required to do the parsing, and the looping approach to getting the results from the tagging results is pretty fast for must uses. As for the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF: mxDecl = [] mxDecl.extend( [ ( (None, 207, ((None, 204, (mxDecl, 2)), (None, 207, (('match', 204, (mxDecl, 1)), (None, 204, (mxDecl, 2))), 1, 0))),), ( (None, 207, ( (None, 21, '?'), (None, 204,(mxDecl, 2)), (None, 207, (('match', 204, (mxDecl, 1)), (None, 204, (mxDecl, 2))),1, 0), (None, 21, '!'))),), ( (None, 207, ( (None, 11, '-_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ:. ', 1),)),) ] You can find it in the generator's tupleset attribute: table = generator.buildParser( declaration ).tupleset I've never felt the need to add AppendMatch, but the code is available if someone wants to add the syntax to the EBNF grammar and the objectgenerator code. Enjoy, Mike Pekka Niiranen wrote: > I am searching nested strings that are limited (and include) > with ?- and ! -signs. > > I have created a nested EBNF-search pattern with Simpleparse-1.0 module > for mxTextTools. The problem is: I am interested only on matched strings > > and cannot use flag (true or not ?) "AppendMatch" with SimpleParse. > > What is the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF -notation below: > > declaration := a,(match,a)* > match := '?',a,(match,a)*,'!' > := [-_a-z0-9A-Z:. ]* #Not returning this line > > in case of a string "aa?BB?CC!DD!ee?FF!gg" > it should return: > > [?BB?CC!DD!, ?CC!, ?FF!] > > Any help appreciated, > > -pekka- > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/ > http://lists.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users > -- _______________________________________ Mike C. Fletcher http://members.rogers.com/mcfletch/ From krissepu@vip.fi Sun Jun 9 22:46:39 2002 Received: from populo.vip.fi (populo.vip.fi [213.173.130.25]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g59KkcU21220 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 22:46:39 +0200 Received: from vip.fi (DynIP-132-158.Tre.vip.fi [213.173.132.158]) by populo.vip.fi (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA22272 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:46:35 +0300 Message-ID: <3D03BE07.549505AC@vip.fi> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 23:43:51 +0300 From: Pekka Niiranen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com References: <3D036557.7E7360F1@vip.fi> <3D03AACF.5060700@rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [egenix-users] More questions and PEPs: How to create nested search pattern with mxTextTools? Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I tried previously various approaches, but two problems remain: 1) Re.findall() returns also empty matches, which I have to clean. 2) I am looping thru several files and displaying results as dictionary: ("filename", [list of parameters in this file]) so when later replacing parameters I only access those parameter that exist in a file. This should speed up replacements compared to a case where I run single huge merged list (like a sed -file ) of all (parameter,replacement) -pairs to all files in one go. (i.e searching parameters that do not necessary exist in current processed file) The current bottleneck is the building of [list of parameters in this file] which leads to the following "PEPs": a) Parameter to re.findall() to allow only non-empty matches in search result. b) Option to mxTextTools to return only unique matches from processed text as list of strings. True, I can get rid of looping thru single lines, but then I have to take account the contents of the previous line in EBNF as we discussed before. I will try that in future too. In your post below, I only have to replace the integer numbers as mxTextTool's command names and then add manually "+AppendMatch" -parameter to certain commands, right ? -pekka- "Mike C. Fletcher" wrote: > Pekka, are you sure you're not optimising this app too early? I mean, > you're only dealing with 2MB files. The simple loop over the results > table isn't likely to be a time problem compared to your original > solution with line-by-line regex runs. If you code the whole grammar as > an EBNF so you can process the whole file in a single call to > TextTools.tag, you're not likely going to be able to detect the time > required to do the parsing, and the looping approach to getting the > results from the tagging results is pretty fast for must uses. > > As for the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF: > > mxDecl = [] > mxDecl.extend( > [ > ( > (None, 207, ((None, 204, (mxDecl, 2)), > (None, 207, (('match', 204, (mxDecl, 1)), > (None, 204, (mxDecl, 2))), 1, 0))),), > ( > (None, 207, ( > (None, 21, '?'), > (None, 204,(mxDecl, 2)), > (None, 207, (('match', 204, (mxDecl, 1)), > (None, 204, (mxDecl, 2))),1, 0), > (None, 21, '!'))),), > ( > (None, 207, ( > (None, 11, > '-_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ:. ', > 1),)),) > ] > > You can find it in the generator's tupleset attribute: > > table = generator.buildParser( > declaration > ).tupleset > > I've never felt the need to add AppendMatch, but the code is available > if someone wants to add the syntax to the EBNF grammar and the > objectgenerator code. > > Enjoy, > Mike > > Pekka Niiranen wrote: > > I am searching nested strings that are limited (and include) > > with ?- and ! -signs. > > > > I have created a nested EBNF-search pattern with Simpleparse-1.0 module > > for mxTextTools. The problem is: I am interested only on matched strings > > > > and cannot use flag (true or not ?) "AppendMatch" with SimpleParse. > > > > What is the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF -notation below: > > > > declaration := a,(match,a)* > > match := '?',a,(match,a)*,'!' > > := [-_a-z0-9A-Z:. ]* #Not returning this line > > > > in case of a string "aa?BB?CC!DD!ee?FF!gg" > > it should return: > > > > [?BB?CC!DD!, ?CC!, ?FF!] > > > > Any help appreciated, > > > > -pekka- > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/ > > http://lists.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users > > > > -- > _______________________________________ > Mike C. Fletcher > http://members.rogers.com/mcfletch/ From krissepu@vip.fi Sun Jun 9 22:53:58 2002 Received: from populo.vip.fi (populo.vip.fi [213.173.130.25]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g59KrvU21261 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 22:53:57 +0200 Received: from vip.fi (DynIP-132-158.Tre.vip.fi [213.173.132.158]) by populo.vip.fi (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA22548 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:53:56 +0300 Message-ID: <3D03BFC0.886D1ECC@vip.fi> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 23:51:12 +0300 From: Pekka Niiranen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com Subject: Re: [egenix-users] How to create nested search pattern with mxTextTools? References: <3D036557.7E7360F1@vip.fi> <3D036CDA.6000202@lemburg.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com Errors-To: egenix-users-admin@lists.egenix.com X-BeenThere: egenix-users@lists.egenix.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: eGenix.com User Mailinglist List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: M-A, Correct me if I am wrong, but does that mean: I can reuse the parser returned by Simpleparse as subtable and use "+AppendMatch" in that new merged table ? The SimpleParse does not support all the commands of mxTextTool. "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > Pekka Niiranen wrote: > > I am searching nested strings that are limited (and include) > > with ?- and ! -signs. > > > > I have created a nested EBNF-search pattern with Simpleparse-1.0 module > > for mxTextTools. The problem is: I am interested only on matched strings > > > > and cannot use flag (true or not ?) "AppendMatch" with SimpleParse. > > > > What is the mxTextTool equivalent of the EBNF -notation below: > > > > declaration := a,(match,a)* > > match := '?',a,(match,a)*,'!' > > := [-_a-z0-9A-Z:. ]* #Not returning this line > > > > in case of a string "aa?BB?CC!DD!ee?FF!gg" > > it should return: > > > > [?BB?CC!DD!, ?CC!, ?FF!] > > > > Any help appreciated, > > You should have a look at the SubTable command. It would allow > you to do this. > > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH > ______________________________________________________________________ > Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ > Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/ > Meet us at EuroPython 2002: http://www.europython.org/ > > _______________________________________________________________________ > eGenix.com User Mailing List http://www.egenix.com/ > http://lists.egenix.com/mailman/listinfo/egenix-users From mal@lemburg.com Mon Jun 10 13:26:56 2002 Received: from lemburg.com (www.egenix.com [217.115.138.139]) by www.egenix.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g5ABQuU27531; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:26:56 +0200 Message-ID: <3D048D2D.5070708@lemburg.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:27:41 +0200 From: "M.-A. Lemburg" Organization: eGenix.com Software GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept